Pharmaceuticals Anonymous

Showing posts with label dsm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dsm. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

DSM: The Truth About Mental Health Disorders - Dr. John Breeding


Do you think the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) is based on science? Listen to this presentation by Dr. John Breeding and learn.
Dr. Breeding's site is Wildest Colts
There are 29 known and documented physical causes of schizophrenia. Look for them in the DSM, and get back to us if you see them there.

Friday, February 5, 2010

DSM-5 to be released Feb. 10, 2012

The DSM-V will be posted for review on Wednesday, February 10, 2010.
It will include proposed revisions and draft diagnostic criteria and will be located on the new DSM5.org Web site - http://www.DSM5.org

Friday, August 21, 2009

How Pharma Giants are Getting Rich by Calling Our Life Problems Medical Disorders



Voodoo diagnostics are major mojo for pharmaceutical corporations - and the pshrinks who prescribe.

In 1994, the DSM-IV was published to considerable acclaim, with a text revision released in 2000. A quick glance through its list of contributors is revealing. As was reported in a 2006 study, lead-authored by Lisa Cosgrove of the University of Massachusetts, 56 per cent (95 of 170) of the researchers who worked on the manual had at least one monetary relationship with a drug manufacturer between 1989 and 2004. Twenty-two per cent of these researchers received consulting income during that period, and 16 per cent were paid spokespersons for a drug company. The percentages are even higher – 100 per cent in some instances – for researchers who contributed to the manual’s subsections on psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. While Cosgrove and her coauthors were not able to determine the percentage of researchers who received funds from the drug industry during the actual production of the DSM-IV, the chorus of protest that arose following their paper’s publication was telling. “I can categorically say,” roared the DSM-IV’s text and criteria editor, Michael First, “that drug-company influence never entered into any of the discussions, whatsoever.”



Images: Dr. John Dee, Elizabethan alchemist and magician, above; and cartoon, The Money Demon, below