Mental Illness and Vitamin D Deficiency

From the Vitamin D Council

Vitamin D has a significant biochemistry in the brain. Nuclear receptors for vitamin D exist in the brain and vitamin D is involved in the biosynthesis of neurotrophic factors, synthesis of nitric oxide synthase, and increased glutathione levels—all suggesting an important role for vitamin D in brain function. Animal data indicates that tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme for all the brain's monoamines, is increased by vitamin D. Rats born to severely vitamin D deficient dams have profound brain abnormalities.

Link

Clearly this is an issue that affects us all! We ask about the most vulnerable - how many children, seniors and incarcerated persons are deficient in Vitamin D - and show abnormalities in behavior and thinking as a result?

USA: HHS Report - One in nine senior citizens goes hungry

So many physical and mental ills are made worse by poor nutrition...

Senior Citizen Politics
One in 9 Senior Citizens Going Hungry Says Report to Senate Aging Committee
Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) says 35 million Americans going hungry, senior citizens are ‘disproportionately affected’

March 10, 2008 – One out of every nine senior citizens in America is going hungry, according to testimony last week at a hearing of the Senate Special Committee on Aging, which was called by the ranking member, Senator Gordon H. Smith (R-OR). Smith said 35 million Americans are going hungry and senior citizens are “disproportionately affected.”

A major reason for the hearing was to showcase the release of findings by the Meals on Wheels Association of America (MOWAA) Foundation, which quantifies the problems and causes of hunger that seniors face and how these trends will continue into the future as our society ages.

“Hunger is a disease that is affecting our country, but unlike other diseases we have a cure for hunger today. Because of Senator Smith's leadership on this issue, we now have a national forum to present these findings,” said Enid Borden, President and CEO of MOWAA.

Key findings included:

● In 2005, over five million seniors, 11.4% of all seniors, experienced some form of food insecurity (i.e., are marginally food insecure).
>> Of these, about 2.5 million are at-risk of hunger (i.e. are food insecure), and about 750,000 actually experienced hunger (i.e., very low food security) due to financial constraints.

● Seniors are more likely to be at-risk of hunger if they are ages 60 to 65, poor, African-American or Hispanic, divorced or separated, living with a grandchild and/or renters.

● In 2025, an estimated 9.3 million senior Americans will experience some form of food insecurity, almost double the number in 2005.

Link
Link to HHS Report - PDF

Obamacare: "Do they really want to croak Granny? - Yes, sometimes"

"While the imposition of this new ethos of death is justly alarming, the more present problem of medical rationing is likely to impact granny much more gravely and much sooner. The rationing of medical treatment for the elderly is marbled throughout the Obama bill in so many places that we will have to address this issue in more detail in a future installment. For example, cancer treatment, much of which is skewed toward an older demographic, will be limited ("adjusted" in Obama-speak, "rationed" in actual English), if it becomes too costly in a particular hospital. (Section 1145) Another example: services to be provided under many plans are quite limited, i.e. rationing. A more attenuated but relevant problem is that hospitals are actually prohibited from expanding, and are limited to their size as of the date of the enactment of the bill, unless a medical politburo, answerable to no one, gives the OK to expand. Thus, treatment options become further limited.

Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, a key medical ethics adviser to the president, and brother of Obama's chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel, has set forth in writing a deadly formula for allocating care. In a January 31, 2009 article in a prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet, he and two co-authors offer a theory they call, "the complete lives system," as a means to decide who gets care and who dies.

In a complex web of interlocking principles for allocating medical treatment, in an environment where rationing is assumed, Dr. Emanuel opines that teenagers should have priority over infants, because they have received more resources from society. Older people, however, are "objectively less valuable," so, yes, granny does have to die. Under this system, using utilitarian and amoral criteria like "distributive justice," young healthy people from ages 15-40 get priority, and the rest, including grandma, may not.

One can infer that this premise will undergird the implementation of the Obama healthcare regime, including the assumption of rationing of care. While the self-anointed messiah Obama brazenly proclaims throughout the land that his deadly healthcare bill will be good for society, the Hebrew prophet Isaiah rightly saw that such thinking reflects that "the dust of death" has settled over a culture.

The Obama bill reflects the ethos of amoral "utility" throughout. For example, in Section 1177, many plans will not be allowed to enroll "special needs" people. No explanation is given as to the rationale behind this cruel mandate."

Link

The Human Rights of Older People in Healthcare

From the UK
Eighteenth Report of Session 2006-07

HL Paper 156-I HC 378-I Published on 14 August 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London:
The Human Rights of Older People in Healthcare 3 Summary In addition to its scrutiny of parliamentary Bills and policy documents for human rights implications, the Committee examines areas where human rights concerns arise, such as the treatment of older persons in health care. In this Report the Committee examines how human rights principles can be applied toensure that older people in hospitals and care homes are treated with greater dignity andrespect (paragraphs 1 - 8).The Committee heard that, while some older people receive excellent care, there are concerns about poor treatment, neglect, abuse, discrimination and ill-considered discharge.It considers that an entire culture change is needed. It also recommends legislative changesand a role for the new Commission for Equality and Human Rights (paragraphs 9 - 65).In the Committee’s view there is a significant distinction between a “duty to provide” undercare standards legislation and a “right to receive” under human rights legislation. It recommends that the Government and other public bodies should champion understandingof how human rights principles can help transform health and social care services (paragraphs 66 - 95).While welcoming the recent acceptance at senior levels in the Department of Health of theimportance of human rights in healthcare, the Committee recommends adoption of astrategy to make the Human Rights Act integral to policy-making and social care across the Department (paragraphs 96 - 124)

Excerpt

26. A number of witnesses expressed concern about the inappropriate use of medication
on older people, including the over or under-use of medication and the use of medication
as a means of controlling patients and residents. Action on Elder Abuse cited the misuse of
medication as one type of abuse which frequently comes to its attention.47 This is a
particular issue in care homes.
27. Again, witnesses accepted that there was good practice in this area,48 but that this was
not universally implemented. Witnesses raised a particular issue of medication being
inappropriately used to keep residents docile.49 As the Alzheimer’s Society’s said:
The response to aggression in dementia is often to prescribe powerful sedative
neuroleptic drugs that can help to calm the person However, these treatments have
very damaging side effects. Medications such Haliperidol, Risperidone and
Olanzipine are being routinely prescribed to people with dementia in hospitals and
care homes. A recent study found that 40% of people with dementia in care homes
are being prescribed neuroleptic drugs.50 Neuroleptics are not licensed for use in
dementia care but have become a convenient staple as part of routine treatment,
despite known evidence on the risks which such ‘treatments’ pose to quality of life
and the increased risk of death.51
28. The concerns of witnesses accord with the findings of the Health Committee that
medication was “in many cases, being used simply as a tool for the easier management of
residents”.52 The National Service Framework for Older People requires that all people over
75 years should normally have their medicines reviewed at least annually and those taking
four or more medicines should have a review every six months.53 In 2006, Living Well in
Later Life noted that “the management of medicines needs to be addressed, as many older
people taking more than four medications are still not receiving a review every six
months”.54 CSCI found that, in 2005-06, only 59% of care homes met the National
Minimum Standard (Standard 9) for medication.55 The Alzheimer’s Society agreed that
there is a very poor record of medication in care homes.56

PDF



Toronto journalist Judy Steed has been writing about social issues for 30 years. Last fall, she embarked on a one-year project to document the most pressing policy implications of our aging society as part of the 2008 Atkinson Fellowship in Public Policy.
She has visited dozens of nursing homes and interviewed hundreds of health-care workers, policy-makers and seniors to present this weeklong portrait.

Day 4 of an eight-day Atkinson Fellowship series
Drugged-out seniors a prescription for disaster
November 11, 2008
JUDY STEED
SPECIAL TO THE STAR

They are the drugged-out generation, and they're not who you think they are.

They're 80. And 85 and 90 and 95 – overmedicated seniors clogging emergency departments, blocking hospital beds and sicker than they have any reason to be.

The Number 1 drug users in North America, outside of patients in long-term care facilities, are women over the age of 65. Twelve per cent are on 10 or more meds, sometimes up to 20 or more drugs; 23 per cent take at least five drugs. In long-term care, seniors are on six to eight medications, on average. Fifteen per cent of seniors admitted to hospital are suffering drug side effects. It's not uncommon to find seniors dizzy and dotty from being prescribed so many drugs.

"You'd fall down, too, if you were on so many drugs," says Dr. William Dalziel, a prominent Ottawa geriatrician.

Typically, overmedicated seniors have been seen by numerous specialists who have prescribed various medications to treat a host of chronic ailments – high blood pressure, hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis, arthritis, heart disease, cancer – but there hasn't been any oversight by a geriatrician skilled in looking at the big picture and assessing contra-indications and side effects. Ask any doctor with expertise in seniors what their top health concerns are and they all cite overmedication.

Article on drugging of seniors from the Toronto STAR
Link